Tuesday, November 21, 2006

Damn, There Goes Quebec - Blame the Scots


A fascinating piece by David Goodhart in today's Washington Post. Scotland, it seems, could decide to bolt from the U.K.:

"London, England - One of the world's most successful multinational states, and a key ally of the United States, could in a few months time start to unravel: I mean, of course, the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland.

"The process will be set in motion if the pro-independence Scottish National Party (SNP) ends up the largest party in the Scottish parliament after elections next May. This is a distinct possibility. The break up of the UK will not be inevitable even if the SNP do dominate the parliament, but it will certainly make the political classes of Britain -- and perhaps of the U.S. and the main EU states too -- think hard about the point and value of the union to them. (Ironically, the elections will come just a matter of days after the 300th anniversary of the creation of modern Britain when the Scottish and English parliaments were merged in 1707.)

"Most people in England who think about these things assumed that the "Scottish question" had been dealt with when, as one of the first acts of the Blair government elected in 1997, it announced the creation of a devolved Scottish parliament with wide ranging powers over domestic matters. But disillusionment with the performance of that parliament (and the UK parliament in London), the long-standing belief that the English "stole" Scotland's oil and gas, and the postmodern temptations of identity politics, have put independence back on the agenda (a recent opinion poll found 51 percent of Scots favoring it).And a new front has now been opened up in the independence debate from the political right. Writing in the latest issue of London-based Prospect magazine, Michael Fry, a conservative Scottish historian, argues that the only way to revive the moderate right in Scotland and to better reflect the country's conservative Calvinistic soul is for former Tories like himself to back the SNP. If enough Tories heed Fry's advice it makes the likelihood of a SNP victory in May even more likely.

"Losing Scotland's 5 million people would not be a huge blow to England's size (more than 50m) and would not damage its main economic and cultural assets. But it would dent its standing in the wider world and might call into question things like the UK's permanent membership of the UN security council. More important it would be another depressing victory for tribalism. The Anglo-Scottish double act has been a rare example of successful multi-culturalism, with the moral earnestness of the Scots leavening the famous pragmatism of the English. On a more practical note, the Ireland model -- with its dynamic economy, and national self-confidence -- is increasingly popular in SNP circles. Yet Ireland looks far more like America than the social-democratic Scandinavian states that the left-wing Scots Nationalists admire. To emulate the Irish model, the Scots would probably need to cut public spending by one-third, not a good start to life as an independent nation."

2 comments:

Anonymous said...

David Goodhart writes from an obvious bias - the 'dear ol' blighty' school of thinking. Scots want independence because they are fed up of decisions being made on their behalf which go against their national interest - witness the decimation of our proud fishing industry at the hands of UK politicians trading it off for something closer to the South East of England.

Scots admire both the Irish and Scandic experiences for different reasons and the suggestion that you can't do both is ridiculous. E.g. Ireland didn't cut public expenditure to grow its economy - it cut corporation tax which in turn grew tax revenue to support their levels of public expenditure. Scandic countries may have higher public expenditure but the other side of the equation is that they have higher wages. This is very simplistic, even poorly researched journalism.

The Mound of Sound said...

You're right Grant. Goodhart's piece is plainly taken from the English perspective. Good point on Ireland's tax policy and how the Scandinavian approach works for their people. Thanks.